
Acknowledge, then redirect: “I want to help, and my current capacity is full. If this is top priority, I can pause X and Y. Which should wait?” This respectful trade‑off language reframes refusal as stewardship, encouraging realistic choices rather than heroic overwork that fails later.

Protect deep work with specifics: “I’m offline 1–3 for heads‑down drafting. If urgent, call; otherwise I’ll reply after three.” Clear availability beats vague apologies, aligns expectations, and stops notification churn from eroding quality, making your eventual yes more reliable and your no less personal.

Name scope creep kindly: “We originally agreed on A and B. Adding C and D changes timeline and risk. Which pieces matter most right now?” Neutral comparisons focus attention on choice and consequence, not blame, preserving rapport while guarding delivery dates and team energy.
All Rights Reserved.